Collection Performance: How Do You LINQ?

Way, way back in 2007, the Language-Integrated Query (LINQ) was introduced as part of .NET 3.5. Since LINQ was new, I spent some time learning how to create the most performant queries, especially for Entity Framework. I learned back then how the query is written can affect performance. In this article, I will show the most performant way to write queries for a collection of objects.

The LINQ API & LAMBDA’S

In the beginning of LINQ API, this is how we wrote a simple where query:

var query = from person in PersonCollection
           where person.Age.TotalDays > 1000
            select person;

var result = query.ToList() // This runs the query

This same query can be written this way using a LAMBDA:

var result = PersonCollection.Where(p => p.Age.TotalDays > 1000).ToList();

Which one do you think is faster?

LINQ: WHERE() CHART
The speed of these two ways to write a simple where query is too close to call. Let’s see how the performance is for other common LINQ methods.

Any()

This LINQ Any() method returns a Boolean if there is even one item in the collection that meets the criteria. There are three ways to use Any().

// API
var query = from person in PersonCollection
           where person.Age.TotalDays > 1000
            select person;
      
var result = query.Any();    
// LAMBDA'S
var result = PersonCollection.Where(p => p.Age.TotalDays > 1000).Any();

OR

var result = PersonCollection.Any(p => p.Age.TotalDays > 1000);

Performance

LINQ: ANY() CHART
As you can see, using Any() as the first method in a LAMBDA call is faster!

First() & FirstOrDefault()

The method First() returns the first item in the collection that meets the criteria while FirstOrDefault() will also return a default value. Below are the different ways to use these methods.

// API
var query = from person in PersonCollection
           where person.Age.TotalDays > 1000
            select person;
      
var result = query.First();

var result = query.FirstOrDefault();       
// LAMBDA'S
var result = PersonCollection.Where(p => p.Age.TotalDays > 1000).First();

var result = PersonCollection.Where(p => p.Age.TotalDays > 1000).FirstOrDefault();

OR

var result = PersonCollection.First(p => p.Age.TotalDays > 1000);

var result = PersonCollection.FirstOrDefault(p => p.Age.TotalDays > 1000);

Performance

LINQ: FIRST() CHART

LINQ: FIRSTORDEFAULT() CHART
As you can see, using First() or FirstOrDefault() as the first method a LAMBDA call is faster!

Last() & LastOrDefault()

The method Last() returns the last item in the collection that meets the criteria while LastOrDefualt() will also return a default value. Below are the different ways to use these methods.

// API
var query = from person in PersonCollection
           where person.Age.TotalDays > 1000
            select person;

var result = query.Last();

var result = query.LastOrDefault();
// LAMBDA'S
var result = PersonCollection.Where(p => p.Age.TotalDays > 1000).Last();

var result = PersonCollection.Where(p => p.Age.TotalDays > 1000).LastOrDefault();

OR

var result = PersonCollection.Last(p => p.Age.TotalDays > 1000);

var result = PersonCollection.LastOrDefault(p => p.Age.TotalDays > 1000);

Performance

HOW DO YOU LINK-LAST-CHARTAs you can see, using Last() or LastOrDefault() as the first method in a LAMBDA call is much, much faster!

Summary

These benchmark results prove, without a doubt, that you should always use Any(), First(), FirstOrDefault, Last(), LastOrDefault or Where() at the beginning of a LAMBDA statement as shown below:

var result = PersonCollection.FirstOrDefault(p => p.Age.TotalDays > 1000);

I apologize if now you must go analyze your codebase for these methods and fix them if needed. It will increase the performance of your applications. If you have any comments, please make them below.

 

Pick up any books by David McCarter by going to Amazon.com: http://bit.ly/RockYourCodeBooks

One-Time
Monthly
Yearly

Make a one-time donation

Make a monthly donation

Make a yearly donation

Choose an amount

$5.00
$15.00
$100.00
$5.00
$15.00
$100.00
$5.00
$15.00
$100.00

Or enter a custom amount

$

Your contribution is appreciated.

Your contribution is appreciated.

Your contribution is appreciated.

DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly

If you liked this article, please buy David a cup of Coffee by going here: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/dotnetdave

© The information in this article is copywritten and cannot be preproduced in any way without express permission from David McCarter.

4 thoughts on “Collection Performance: How Do You LINQ?

  1. Regarding LINQ (Natual Query Integrated into the Language), it compiles to the SAME code as a Lambda written the same way, so the performance (of the same executing code) will be the same….

    The real difference is where the predicate is places, in a call to the Where(…) extension method, or in the call to a method such as First(…). For simple collections [LINQ2SQL and LINQ2EF are difference beasts, as are other implementations), the Where(.,..) will transverse the entire collection passing the result set to the second; on the other hand, firstly using the predicate with First allows the processing to stop as soon the condition is met.

    These effects would be the same, even if the code was written with explicit loops….

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.