Microsoft .NET Code Analysis: Use Auto-Implemented Property

In my book on coding standards, I advise against the excessive use of auto-implemented properties and recommend their limited usage. This recommendation stems from the fact that auto-implemented properties lack the ability to include validation in their setters, potentially leading to issues if invalid data is assigned to the property. However, there are situations where auto-implemented properties can be appropriate and advantageous. Let’s consider a real-world example:

public DateTime StartTime
{
	get
	{
		return startTime;
	}
}

For this particular property, the startTime field is being assigned a value from elsewhere within the type. To address this issue, I recommend refactoring the code to utilize an auto-implemented property. By doing so, you can simplify the code and enhance its maintainability.

public DateTime StartTime { get; }

To set the time within the type, just use the property like this:

this.StartTime = DateTime.Now();

Here are the reasons why utilizing an auto-implemented property is advisable in this case:

1. Conciseness: Auto-implemented properties reduce the amount of code you need to write. By eliminating the need to write explicit getter and setter methods, your code becomes more concise and easier to read.
2. Readability: Auto-implemented properties improve code readability by making the intention of the property clearer. With auto-implemented properties, it’s immediately obvious that you’re defining a simple property without any additional logic.
3. Encapsulation: Auto-implemented properties encapsulate the underlying field within the property. This encapsulation allows you to control access to the property and add additional logic later if needed, without affecting the external usage of the property.
4. Maintenance: Auto-implemented properties simplify code maintenance. If you need to change the logic of a property in the future, you can do so without modifying the public interface of the property. This helps to minimize the impact on other parts of the code that rely on the property.

When I setup the IDE0032 code analysis in my .editorConfig it looks like this: dotnet_diagnostic.IDE0032.severity = suggestion

Summary

In this particular case, utilizing an auto-implemented property is a sensible approach. During my review of the codebase, I identified a significant number of 196 instances where this issue occurs. Considering the magnitude of the refactoring required, it is essential to streamline the process. Tools like CodeRush from DevExpress offer valuable extensions that simplify the refactoring task with a single mouse click, making the process efficient and convenient.

For further guidance and insights, I highly recommend obtaining a copy of my book, “Rock Your Code: Coding Standards for Microsoft .NET” available on Amazon.com. Additionally, to explore more performance tips for .NET, I encourage you to acquire the 3rd edition of “Rock Your Code: Code & App Performance for Microsoft .NET” also available on Amazon.com.

To analyze your code using the same settings I used in these articles, I encourage you to incorporate my EditorConfig file. It can be found at the following link: https://bit.ly/dotNetDaveEditorConfig. I update this file quarterly, so remember to keep yours up to date as well. I hope you will check out my OSS project Spargine by using this link: https://bit.ly/Spargine.

Please feel free to leave a comment below. I would appreciate hearing your thoughts and feedback.

Pick up any books by David McCarter by going to Amazon.com: http://bit.ly/RockYourCodeBooks

If you liked this article, please buy David a cup of Coffee by going here: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/dotnetdave

© The information in this article is copywritten and cannot be preproduced in any way without express permission from David McCarter.